The Golden Spiral
Chapter Five
A Drama based on the DNA exchange in other times on earth:
An old man singing the ballads from Ramayana shows up with his age old harmonium tied to his torso with a military kind of belt. He starts to sing the great verses of Valmiki Ramayana, which was to be later tampered with by many, especially Goswami Tulasidaas. (Some of the writers of ancient India.)
He sings and starts to narrate this story.
Now let me draw a parallel, Parasurama, was none other than Abraham, who sacrificed both of his sons for whom Ishmael and Ishaq were same as for Shiva sacrificed both Ganesha and Kartikeya. The whole thing is a Metaphor. The word sacrifice does not mean “Beheading”, it means “Not even Killing.” The word Sacrifice means “Shiva-Shakti” allow, lovingly, both of their children Ganesha and Kartikeya to become separated aspects than being attached aspects of themselves. Even Rama’s killing of Ravana was as I told you an act of Rhythm + Mobility overpowering Inertia then, all these tales and sub stories are written after Rama went off and for thousands of years the stories were being told only to people like tribal etc.
Their drawback was that they did not understand or speak any of the classical languages like Paali, Sanskrit, Tamil, etc. They spoke what is called Apabhramsha Apa-Bhramsha, itself is explanatory self explanatory and comes from the word Bhramsha. Like Aacharyaa Drona did not teach Ekalavya, because he was a Shoodra Karana and was cursed by Parasurama because he lied being a Brahmin. It was a Kshatriya, the whole drama of Ramayana is about how Man kind has been rendered” powerless and kept away from knowing his/ her origin humankind.
Curtain Falls…
Curtain raises again...
Rama was an incarnate just as Jesus was, and now see the parallel here. Jesus acted in such a way, that the entire World called Judas a Traitor they in fact drove him to commit suicide. Judas was found Hanging by a tree so did he die on the tree or on the cross? And they swapped places? Jesus walked free from the scene as in those days All Jews looked same and they dressed same.
All the disciples of Jesus looked same except one girl Mary Magdalene. He had 12 Disciples and she did Paaduka Poojai (anointment of his feet) just before Jesus was to be arrested. Similarly Ahilya, Rama actually charged her sexuality back by just touching her she had become what people call that as “Frigid.”
That she could live a normal life and not a STONE as metaphorically told, we misconstrued it as a stone, literally. Mary, but Jesus’ wife in a way, the entire country called her a prostitute because Jesus embraced her.
Do you see his remarkable level of acceptance? I know many things, silently observe when others speak then I analyze it later.
As Jesus when he “Ran-away” from the hands of the Romans, after they put some poor fellows on the cross, because that was the only land even then who would believe in his being a “Son of God.”
This is what must have happened: Jesus thought he was the son of God. He landed in India and there he saw “Nobody was thinking he was weird calling himself a son of God.”
All those who were present there were highly evolved as well and he was stunned at their reception so he learnt from them other arts and came back "changed."
That is what Romans did not like. They banished him second time and some stories got charred in the rioting. Many of Jesus’ disciples were questioning his own simplicity and how he had changed in Time and space. Saint Paul asked him, “How I can be sure, that you are my master Christ?”
So Jesus said to him “Put your hand here, into my hip and see if you can still find my torture wounds.”
Paul placed his fingers and immediately he saw blood. He knew it was him now parallel to how Rama was captured by Ahiraavana along with Lakshamana and brought over drugged by the smart son of Ravana to “Paataala,” means where? He was brought to his side of the world. America and only Hulk/Hanuman could fly cross the world and rescue both Rama and Lakshamana and at that time, Kapila Muni used to do Ashwamedha Yagnya in a place Kapilavana strikes something?
Vishwamitra. All these caste systems were supposed to Kapila muni was one of the Star Seeds who manifested as a human being. The yagnya that he was performing some austerities in this area he communicated telepathically with vashishtha Shamika also begs rama he actually used Black magic techniques to attack Brahmins like Vishwamitra was being troubled by Taraka. So did Rama not Kill Taraka on the insistence of a Brahmin (Kshatriya turned Brahmin) the only Conversion in the history of Hinduism. Conversion*
It is all a Metaphor. Rama and Jesus are no different in fact all are One. Shamika, Rama and Vishwamitra are all One, is in conflict due to their levels of evolution coming to that Jesus and Rama had parallel stories. Rama was sacrificed by his ‘Father’. Note the word ‘Father’. Dasharatha (a man who could ride ten chariots at one time, a metaphor) sends his son away. So Jesus also called out publicly when he was being hung on the cross (metaphorically cross is “Nothing but Conflict within”). Jesus called out, “Oh Father, how can you forsake me at this moment?”
Rama also cried when his father sent the message to his son, saying he was being banished into the jungles he also said the same words within, “Oh father, how can you forsake me at this moment when I am to be crowned a king?” All characteristics were common, Jesus touched Mary, Rama touched Ahilya just interchange it. Rama touched Mary Magdalene, Jesus Touched Ahilya the same way. Same way Rukmini was kidnapped by Krishna against the wishes of all.
Ahilya also could have been called a prostitute in a way but was never mentioned as such by the so called Rama followers because they cannot see their master ‘Befall’ touching a woman of lower vibration. But Jesus was a Master of acceptance.
He embraced Death. What was his death? Not leaving the body, but he left that Country that did not believe him that he was Son of God.
Comparing my meditative messages about Jesus Christ, about whom I had never read through the eyes of a “Bible scholar” I found many links to this information. I had about Jesus’ real life through my meditation and messages thereof, that connect with my thoughts. One of such links is presented below:
JESUS
|
|
Religious figure: born, ca. 6 B.C., in Bethlehem; died, ca. 25-27 A.D., outside Jerusalem; raised in Nazareth, Palestine. Parents were Mary and Joseph, who were a rather well off couple engaged in an independent business enterprise; they were betrothed, but not married.
[An aside: The end of the second millennium - two thousand years after the birth of Jesus - occurred in 1994 by the above account. The calendar we use has been adjusted a number of times, and other authoritative computations place the birth of Jesus as late as 4 B.C., but no later, in which case the millennium ended in 1996. On no account is the year 2000 actually the second millennium of anything.]
The story goes that Jesus was born in a manger, because there was no room for his parents at the inn. People get romantic about this, for at that time and place, inns had a particular construction which had less expensive (and less desirable) accommodation on the first level, along with stables for the animals of the patrons. The more costly lodging upstairs away from the smells was an open plan affair, where travelers slept in rows, next to one another, sharing the space available. Since that society was then (as it still is) dominated by male preferences and directives, "no room at the inn" may simply have meant that there was no room for a woman to give birth right in-between a bunch of men tired from the day's tribulations -- so Mary and Joseph had to go downstairs where they would not prevent high-priced customers from sleeping. There is evidence that Joseph had ready cash to pay for any lodging available. The costlier accommodations were just not available, considering all factors; being born in the stable has nothing to do with humility.
The Magi (from the "East") who are said to have later appeared at the site of the birth (whether there were two, or three, or many more is under heavy debate) were probably Zoroastrians; they were not Jews. It has been said that Judaism is a Zoroastrian heresy, and that Christianity is a Jewish heresy. The original meaning of "heresy" is "thinking for one's self." What's next?
Jesus' daily language was Aramaic, but he learned Hebrew (which he was able to read too) and could also have been capable in Greek and Latin. Otherwise, Jesus was a Mediterranean Jewish peasant who worked with his hands and became one of the greatest moral teachers of antiquity. Probably he was a nice guy. His preaching career lasted from one to a maximum of three years.
A number of the recent translations of Dead Sea scrolls, among other ancient documents being currently examined -- a large quantity exists -- tell an interesting set of variations (from the popular versions) on the story of the life of Jesus.
Jesus had sisters and four brothers (the Bible gives their names, although none of them accomplished much, with one exception), but this has been disputed by some and their relationship to Jesus is subject to conjecture. However, Joseph died long before Jesus' public life began and Jesus, being a responsible sort and the (perhaps) eldest child, cared for Mary and the "other children" until they were able to fend for themselves, after which time Jesus entered his teaching career at about age thirty. How much time passed between the conclusion of Jesus' child-care responsibilities and the beginning of his preaching is not known, nor is the process by which Jesus formed his philosophies, but some clues on this topic follow elsewhere below.
The one exceptional sibling mentioned above was Jesus' twin brother, who probably was named Judas (a common name at the time.) Some extremely interesting recent research supports the thesis of the existence of such a person, and the evidence is growing as scholarship in the field advances. Also, on the topic of names, "Thomas" (the dominant "other" at the time of Jesus -- as in 'doubting Thomas', etc.) is a corruption of a word in Aramaic which means "twin." In Aramaic, Thomas was not an actual name at all. Since the character 'Thomas' was seen to interact closely with Jesus, current wisdom suggests that reference was being made to the twin of Jesus, likely Judas.
Judas Iscariot was also not the actual complete name of anyone, exactly. Iscariot is not a family name. "Iscariot" is a modifier, not merely a sobriquet, such as Jesus "Christ", or Jack "the Ripper." "Iscariot" has many meanings, if one listens to all the interpreters. They describe the word as indicating everything from traitor, to leather worker. The intriguing recent scholarship referred to above suggests that it likely means something close to traitor, but more than that has been learned, such as this:
Judas, the jealous lesser twin brother, was also the disciple who betrayed Jesus, but as the fatal moment came, he was overwhelmed with remorse and, looking the same as Jesus, surreptitiously substituted himself, thereby allowing Jesus to escape to safety. It was Judas who was crucified on the cross, to the confusion of all who understood him to be Jesus. To conceal this deceit, the grave of "Jesus" was opened and the corpse of Judas removed, since a close examination would have revealed the clever substitution. Judas Iscariot, the betraying disciple, was the exact same Judas who was the brother of Jesus.
Abandoning his disintegrating constituency (which was dispersing upon the 'failure' of the teaching of Jesus due to his "death") Jesus fled. Here the stories differ interestingly. One version maintains that Jesus ventured to India (where yet some other stories claim he had received his philosophic training in the first place as a younger man.) A second version has him off to Kashmir, and the third has him going to France !
Although no one supports the French connection with real enthusiasm (which may be a mistake), the Indians do like the India story. The version which has the most acceptable recent scholarship behind it is the one placing Jesus in Kashmir. At that time, as well as up to quite recently, Kashmir was indeed a paradise, so the report offered by Mary Magdalene that Jesus had gone to heaven was quite literally factual. The confused interpretation of her story by others that Jesus had gone "up" into Heaven may have actually been accepted (and not corrected) by her as a clever method of salvaging the rapidly dissipating support for Jesus' teachings, which she felt were worth perpetuating -- plus, if he had escaped death and gone to paradise, so could the masses, as they estimated.
To this day there is a reverently maintained tomb of Jesus Christ, in Kashmir.
In the end, the most probable story is that Mary Magdalene went to Kashmir with Jesus where they raised a family, did honest work, and lived to a ripe old age, he having retired from the preaching business judging it to be a bit risky.
[A digression: The Nag Hammadi Gnostic Gospels , discovered in Chenoboskion, Egypt in December, 1945 (but not released by the Egyptian government to the general public until 1977 - and still far from complete in translation today), are likely older than the gospels in the "standard" bible, which is the source of most of our conventional knowledge of Jesus.
In the first two centuries after the death of Jesus, there were many competing versions of Christianity. Each of them accused the others of heresy and fraud, in an attempt to gain followers and power. In this process, those subscribers to the version of events which was to become the teaching of the Catholic Church won this political battle to the exclusion of other beliefs. The conflicting philosophy of the Gnostics was subject to hostile suppression, and their writings were destroyed and history rewritten -- except for those books discovered in Egypt in 1945.
The Gnostic account of events -- and point of view about them -- is often similar in interpretation (of the more ancient Jewish scriptures) to the versions more familiar to us, but just as often, it differs greatly. Some examples: In the story of Adam and Eve and the Serpent, the Gnostic version tells us that Eve is the spiritual principle in humanity who raises Adam from his base material condition. The serpent is not evil, but rather the bringer of wisdom. In this account, God does not carry out a threat of death and banishment if Adam and Eve should eat of the tree of knowledge; His character is changed here -- He is not jealous that the man and woman have discovered wisdom. The use of metaphor was normal to the Gnostics, who avoided all suggestion of authoritarianism.
Ponder the difference in the treatment of women during the last 2000 years, had Eve's role been taught through the centuries as it is portrayed in the Gnostic gospels...
On the topic of Jesus, the Gnostics tell us that he enjoyed telling a good joke, a party with his friends, some decent wine; he was fond of garlic and had a healthy appetite. While he had started out as a slender carpenter (maybe -- the record is not clear), he rounded out some as he did his preaching.
Most interestingly, they portray him as normal. We are told that his constant and intimate companion was Mary Magdalene, whom he loved more than all the rest of his disciples put together. In fact, the other disciples were offended when he frequently would kiss her passionately in their presence. To quote, "They said to Him, 'Why do you love her more than all of us?' The Savior answered and said to them, 'Why do I not love you as (I love) her?'" They frowned and perspired a lot as they thought this over...
Jesus was three cubits tall (160cm, or 5'3"). Also, he was Black, and likely a member of one of those "lost" Jewish tribes now found just in Ethiopia but who were dispersed widely in the Middle East at the time.
The Gnostics did not view God as "other," but rather that God could be found within one's self. They did not accept events in religious history as being physical, flesh and blood facts (as in the orthodox dogma of the Catholic church, concerning such items as the virgin birth, or the resurrection), but rather as symbolic lessons; metaphor as a spiritual guide. They presented a philosophy, not absolute laws.]
Back to the life of Jesus:
The orthodox bible tells us that as he was about to enter public life, Jesus went to John the Baptist, asking for baptism -- a ceremonial process indicating a cleansing to those who were repentant of their sins -- although Jesus seems never to have thought of himself as a sinner in need of repentance, in spite of his extreme ethical standards and simultaneous relationship to Mary M...
The baptism was a "soul shaking experience" the standard Bible tells us. Jesus heard a voice "from heaven: 'Thou art my beloved Son; with thee I am well pleased.' " He at once began a "forty day" meditation in the wilderness, which resulted in him understanding what his unique relation to God involved, but, at the same time, he saw that it did not exempt him from the ordinary limitations of men.
"Forty days" appear repeatedly in the lives of many antique religious figures. Also Lent is forty days long; the Jews spent forty years in the desert; Noah's flood was forty days and forty nights long; in the Russian Orthodox Church the deceased are mourned for forty days; etc., etc.; we even work forty hours...
John was arrested by Herod Antipas; Jesus began his preaching; John was executed.
Jesus taught his moral philosophy by pithy sayings that were easy to remember, and by parables -- some of which were obvious in their meaning, some were not (he was not that good at speech-making really). He expanded his concern for the downtrodden, and sought disciples who would assist in his crusade, though he did not demand that any join him. The Gnostic gospels make it clear that Jesus' disciples were women, as well as men. (Which makes a lot of sense, since women -- especially at that time -- have shown themselves to be much more skilled at care-giving, an ability essential to the concerns of Jesus.)
While his religious movement grew, curiously he took none of the steps that prudence might have prescribed for perpetuating his mission. He wrote no book, nor did he elaborate an organization (compare Mohammed's mighty enterprise). Perhaps this is not surprising since his whole career may have lasted only one year. Eventually, because of his new ideas, Jesus ran afoul of the religious leaders of his people and was betrayed by a disciple (his brother, Judas) who led the authorities to him. Considering these responses, Jesus felt that he had failed.
There are other accounts of the fate of Judas of course, aside from that mentioned earlier (getting crucified in place of Jesus.) In the version of all this which has Judas surviving and Jesus dead, one account (Matt. 27:5) says that Judas hung himself. The better story is found in Acts 1:18, which says that Judas exploded !
The orthodox dogma of today tells us that Jesus was executed, and admirers (not his disciples), who were Pharisees, buried him in a stone grave. His disciples also believed that he had failed, and scattered in fear not wanting to get themselves crucified too.
The execution of "Jesus" (?) was on a Friday; the Bible states that the grave was found empty by Mary Magdalene on the following Sunday (did she know who had removed Judas?). According to John, 20:17, Jesus appeared to Mary (the "Gospel of Mary" - discovered in 1896 - says that she received a "vision in her mind" - perhaps this is a bit more realistic, especially if we consider who's idea the vision was...), and instructed her to tell his disciples that he was ascending to God in Heaven; which she did, sort of. Soon disciples all over the place stated that they too had "seen" and recognized Jesus (which confirmed their closeness to him in the eyes of others, as the plan went.) Luke reports that the appearances continued for "forty days." Who really saw what is not at all clear in my mind.
However, the disciple Simon Peter claimed that it was he to whom Jesus first appeared (grabbing the spotlight), and it was to him that Jesus delegated power and authority over the Christian church. The institution which grew following this claim maintained that Peter's declaration of the first appearance was true and correct -- never mind that two of the gospels of the New Testament clearly state that Jesus appeared first -- with instructions -- to Mary Magdalene. Peter's asseveration of authority is still the basis for the structure of the Roman Catholic Church, and is the specific upon which the Pope maintains control today. Politics... At the same time "Peter" is a corruption of a word meaning "rock", so he may have been merely symbolic anyway.
The Gnostics included an equal number of men and women among the leaders of their faith. The orthodox Roman Christian institutional authority structure grew from a Middle Eastern society heavily dominated by males. It most definitely did not grow from any proclamation of Jesus. Hence male priests, et cetera.
The reported resurrection of Jesus is the event which saved his teachings from disappearing. The disillusionment which gripped his disciples would have caused his teaching to vanish had their faith not been ignited by this (apparent) exciting escape from death, which they felt they could obtain as well if they did what Jesus had said; it seems to have worked for him.
The deification of Jesus progressed while the Catholic church rose to power as the state religion after the second century. In this process, the church proclaimed as solid fact stories that were not present in the earliest written accounts. Such as: the virgin birth, the performance of miracles, sacrificial murder, and subsequent resurrection. All of these are typical events, which can be recognized in descriptions of the lives of many deified heroes (e.g. Hercules, Osiris, Wodan, Odoacer) but the church fathers insisted on absolute literalism in the understanding of their stories -- Jesus was in the process of being deified, and a power structure needed to be built...
© Jerome C. Krause
Courtesy : http://www.abacom.com/~jkrause/jesus.html
Elsewhere, in the book The Hiram Key by Robert Lomas and Christopher Knight, I found an interesting reference which states the confusion in Pilates Pontius’ mind about who was the real Jesus. Whether he made a secret pact with Jesus himself or with the Jewish priests, to crucify Jesus, or Barabbas (whose first name was also Jesus, ironically) or another person, who claimed to be the “King of Jews.” This man could have been the ‘Jealous twin brother” of Jesus, who presumably looked like Jesus and replicated his presence in both Babylon and Jerusalem during the three crucial years of Jesus, from his 29th year onwards, until he resurfaced from his sabbatical, only to be ‘’ officially crucified’’ as per all Biblical records.
If what is found in the Dead Sea scrolls in Nag Hammadi is true, then Jesus did have a twin brother, who though looked like Jesus could not perform any of the miracles that Master Jesus could easily do. This lead to great confusion in people whenever Jesus’ twin came forward as Jesus himself, while Jesus was traveling with “Two Indian Businessmen” named Ganid and Gonod, in the Mediterranean area. These two Indian businessmen later helped Jesus in his transition when he walked away with Mary Magdalene and had a family in Kashmir (Pakistan occupied Kashmir now.) In those three years when Jesus did take a sabbatical from Jerusalem, he had instructed only one of his twelve apostles that he would be sending money to mother Mary regularly through that Apostle. Even mother Mary had given hope on Jesus’ being alive until Jesus reappeared just on time for the act of crucifixion.
From the Hiram Key:
But, coming to the word ‘Crucifixion” itself, I have always understood it a bit differently as I wasn’t raised a Christian. The “Cross” itself is an inner churning of “Knowledge and Ignorance.” Every saint does have to go through such “Inner cleansing” within for them to be able to teach the outside world about what grand realities they feel exist without the necessity for the Ego to find an empirical evidence outside of itself. In that way, even Jesus Christ had to undergo his own established “Inner Churning” metaphorically called “Bearing the cross.” Being “Crucified” is the “Killing of the Kamsa within Krishna’s consciousness for Him to become a complete God Incarnate.”
Rama also ran away or just went away and never wanted to return, but since he thought all must have changed he returned along with the Vedas from Ravana but bringing the vedas back. Raakshasas was a word coined from the word “Vayam Rakshaamaha.”
Raakshasas do not mean to have thorns, horns, big claws, mustaches etc. When the same outcaste people before Dasharatha were spoiling all the good deeds of Brahmins and they were being even attacked by Tarakas and others, they all ran away from the central Uttar Pradesh to South India as it was all jungles.
So Ravana was the only King who owned an airplane in those days called the Pushpaka Vimaana. It was kind of a hang glider he built, and since he was powerfully built he could fly and come to mainland to hunt.
So when he used to visit the mainland he would invariably take away women and all for his clan to have cross breed with other tribal people. Also, South Indian women were more beautiful than Sinhalese, and in those days, Kings could take any girl away in one of his hunting episodes.
Ravana encountered a handful of Brahmins performing the Maha Mrityunjaya Yagnya. He just kept a silent vigil over it. The Brahmins were scared to complete the Yagnya because that would mean they could ‘Conquer the Death” which was Ravana’s main goal.
How today do we see that science is trying to conquer death still? Same way Ravana wanted and the poor Brahmins did not have the tools or resources and place to complete their laboratory work of DNA modification. They moved to jungles and did such work clandestinely, otherwise Kings from Ayodhaya would have killed them. So they lived poorly and in small huts they started this mission to try and make the DNA modification in such a way that at least one person on Earth can become ‘Immortal’.
So, Ravana got lured and he said, “Okay Brahmin boys, you give me the secret code of DNA and I shall protect you all from these Kshatriyas.” The word “We shall protect” you...became “Vayam Rakshamaha,” and hence the clan that lived in Ravana’s kingdom came to be known as “Raakshasas.”
While all this was happening as a secret mission. The art of changing DNA to such a degree that any weapon won’t kill that man and he shall have such a body and the capacity to convert from the physical to energy body at will. This without loss of time, when there is even an explosion as big as a nuclear bomb nearby within milliseconds and then when the explosion and its after effects have died down. It will re manifest as the original body. Since energy cannot kill energy it only gets doubled.
Enter Mr. Vibheeshana, Ravana actually usurped Power from his other brother Kubera, vibheeshana actually triggered the Code to take a different route just minutes. Ravana was to change his DNA permanently, the Brahmins told if we change your DNA now we won’t be able to revert it any cost.
The only person who could do it would be Rama who was yet to even have been born. Hence Shakti, manifested in the form of Seetha, Rama’s consort. Vibheeshana never told anyone he acted on his own accord as he was aware of Ravana’s traits. Ravana was unjust with his other brother Kubera. Vibheeshana knew that Ravana would have killed him too, once his DNA process was complete and how could Ravana accomplish that? For this he would have to drink the blood of Rama in one way. (Again metaphorically stated by the many writers of Ramayana, who did not find a better word for the process called Miscegenation.) Or, mix his DNA with Rama’s they were twin flames born wide apart living in Parallel universes not even knowing each other’s functions, until they meet on the battle ground.
Likewise in Mahabharata, the great epic created by Veda Vyasa. He was a great writer who started to write about all the brilliant characters in this battle to take place. He wrote about all splinter warring groups before the actual battle was to start. Till that time nobody really even knew what really the purpose of this great bloodshed to take place was. It was also a nuclear war and many nuclear weapons were used, including guided missiles.
The story writer created a character called Lord Krishna. He then was writing the events as they took place and did not know what power he had already extended to the main hero of this theme. Krishna revealed the Bhagawad Geeta only to his own Twin Flame Arjuna (The righteous one). That turned out to be the biggest surprise to all as one of the greatest of warriors of that battle. Bheeshma said to others as the Bhagawad Geetha was being delivered: “We are so unfortunate that we can’t even hear what is being transferred as the supreme source of all knowledge on earth to Arjuna at this moment.” (That was another example of what happens when such exchange of DNA is pre destined to take place in future events.)
Meanwhile in the story of Rama lord much before, Brahmins said to Ravana before they could actually test on any human the DNA changing method this secret gets out of Sri Lanka when Ravana is killed. But who gets the secret? It is very, very controversial. Ravana, why he was so powerful and why all were afraid of him? He had the wit and intelligence of ten heads and strength of twenty hands as well. Hence he was called Dashaanana. Brahmins tells, “Oh Ravana, we can alter only one person’s DNA in this era and that itself will make one man immortal which would be a great imbalance in human life and nature’s laws."
"So, we have to choose the best candidate for that and we must be re assured by that person that he won’t misuse such powers once attained. Since you are the king of this region, we want to honor you with that power and entrust the job to you to get us the best candidate for such an experiment on a human being. But only after we have chosen and used this upon someone shall we come to know whereto find the other half of such a DNA strand. Otherwise we would have to seek from India or some other land for the second half of the DNA."
Ravana was thoughtful. He could not show his greed to those Brahmins. Otherwise the Brahmins would have backed off and they would have asked him go under oath before they even enter his land that Greed shall not enter his self. So Brahmins says, “We won’t do this, unless you give us your word that you shall not have any greed." And the only witness to this is Vibheeshana. Vibheeshana knew that something would certainly go wrong as Brahmins find out at the time of injecting the DNA change into Ravana.
They wanted to abort the mission but they were fearful of being killed. In fact Ravana may have even made the mistake of killing them assuming that the job was completed. So Vibheeshana a great scholar knew that something was amiss and he kept the secret to blackmail Ravana from “Not killing himself." Vibheeshana and always told, Ravana that your other half is with a gentleman who will come to fight you his name will be Rama. But Ravana’s ego did not want to hear that. So he always visualized Rama as a weakling and completed his Siddhi of DNA changing and thus wished to rule the Three Lokas (The three worlds). Vibheeshana did better than that.
He also slipped in a ‘Leaf’ from the jungles along with the DNA changing substance the Brahmins used, secretly which went and sat in the navel area as a weak spot in his entire body. This became his trump card to survive and save himself from being killed by Ravana. Then Vibheeshana defected to Rama’s Army to narrate how Rama can defeat Ravana and save the world by not allowing him to complete the DNA change.
Rama asked Vibheeshana, “How can we believe you? You also belong to the same family. How can I believe you are on my side?" So Vibheeshana asked Hanuman and Lakshamana to leave and wanted to talk with Rama alone at which Lakshamana was furious. They thought Vibheeshana may kill Rama by backstabbing when others were away and Rama was not facing Vibheeshana.
So they did not want to leave. Rama gave permission to Vibheeshana to speak into his ears. Nobody other than Rama really knew what the main reason was for the ongoing conflict between Rama and Ravana and what was behind all that was happening then. Vibheeshana told him that Rama and Ravana were actually twin flames, and if they both meet and DNA’s exchanged then the earth cannot take such an explosion and all humankind may die permanently.
Imagine from Mendeleefe’s periodic table, if the element that features on the first and 108th tables meet, what could happen? Same way Rama and Ravana could cause such a chaotic effect for earth. So Evolution would have come to a full stop. Hence Rama was convinced and said protect Vibheeshana from the enemies trying to kidnap him till “I Meet Ravana person to person.” So when Rama manifested Ravana had to move on. Ravana gets hit by Rama in the navel which Vibheeshana tells him at the end of the Dashami. (Tenth day of the lunar month.) That DNA is used to wash all those who died in that war and they are all resurrected, and that which came out of Ravana’s navel and was called Amrita.
Then Rama asked, “Who here has the guts to drink this one and remain immortal on this Mrityuloka (land of Death) permanently? And who would volunteer?”
Seetha says to Hanuman, “You are the only one who deserves this, so better drink this nectar and remain on earth serving humankind always.” But how does Seetha know all this? In between the kidnapping and the beginning of the war “shakthi” manifests as Maayaa devi. Seetha is energy consciousness so she also drinks part of the DNA. Now when she is asked to undergo ‘agni pariksha’ it meant that she had to take the test and is declared positively not pregnant and her sanctity was intact. This was called Seetha’s chastity. But this new species that is breeding inside her is so clever that is can evade the sensors that find out pregnancy.
So Rama also plays along her drama and he doesn’t say, she is pure and untouched by Ravana. He accepts her back even though her DNA had changed. But one day in his court some washer-man accuses him of living with a wife who had ‘lived with Ravana’. So Rama is forced to forsake her and he asks Lakshmana to take her and to leave her in the jungles. Now comes the other Ramayana writer, hence distortion starts. Valmiki, saved Seetha from committing suicide, due to her guilt of having been sent away by her husband. King Rama saw this as his only chance to learn something called the art of cloning from Seetha, who had learnt about that while being held a captive by Ravana in Sri Lanka.
So he saved her and learned that art. Soon a lovely child was born and they name him Luv. One day Vaalmiki is meditating and chanting the Gayatri mantra. Luv the infant is sleeping in the cradle, and Seetha had gone to bring food and twigs. Vaalmiki is so deeply focused in his Dhyaanaa (Meditation) that he fails to notice when Luv woke up and crawled into the jungle following his mother’s smell and soon meets her too.
Meanwhile, Vaalmiki gets a shock of his life to see the child missing as for him the child was that of Raja Rama. He could have waited for Luv to come back as he could know from his Dhyaanaa, but greed hit him.
He wanted his newly acquired technique of cloning to be tested upon and to take effect. He picked up one strand of hair lying in the child’s cradle, and with pure science of mantras he cloned another baby and named him Kusha after the name of the dry grass he uses to complete this cloning. That grass is still famous as Kusha or Dharbha in India.
End of Story
Curtain falls
 | |||
|
